SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Raj) 114

JAGAT NARAYAN
Kalawati – Appellant
Versus
Munsif Bayana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.P. Jain, for Petitioners; Vishinlal, for Respondents

JAGAT NARAYAN, J.—This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution by Smt. Kalawati and Smt. Kisturi directed against a decision of Munsif Bayana acting as a Tribunal under R. 78 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyaya Panchayat Election Rules 1960 setting aside their co-option as members of the Brahmvad Panchayat.

2. The election of the Panchas and Sarpanch of the Panchayat took place on 10.12.60. On 11.12.60 the Sarpanch issued notices convening a special meeting for the co-option of two women on 18.12.60. According to the Sarpanch no co-option took place at this meeting as adjourned it on the ground that there was an apprehension of a breach of peace taking place. No date for holding the adjourned meeting was however fixed at that time. The Sarpanch issued notices on 28.12.60 convening a special meeting for co-option on 30.12.60. On that date, Smt. Kalawati and Smt. Kisturi were declared as co-opted. Their co-option was challenged by respondents 3 to 8 on a number of grounds. The Tribunal held that the Sarpanch had no power to convene a special meeting for co-option beyond 15 days from the date of his election as Sarpanch in view of the provision of sec. 9(2) of the Rajasthan P

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top