SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Raj) 190

JAGAT NARAYAN
Bheekchand – Appellant
Versus
Parbhuji – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shrikishan Mal Lodha, for Applicants; B.N. Chanda, for Respondent

JAGAT NARAYAN, J. —This is a revision application by the plaintiffs in a suit for recovery of money which was decreed by the trial court, but was dismissed by the appellate court.

2. The suit was instituted against Ranji, Parbhuj, and Mulji sons of Panaji on the allegation that they carried on business in partnership at Balotra in the name Ranji Panaji and had dealings with the plaintiffs beginning from Asad Badi 13, Smt. 2008 corresponding to 20.6.52. It was alleged that they purchased one bag of tobacco worth Rs. 90/- on that date and purchased 11 bags of tobacco 10 days later worth Rs. 2001/-. Further they were alleged to have made payments from time to time. An accounting took place between the parties on 26.10.54 when a debit balance of Rs. 462.8.0 was found against them for which a fresh Khata was executed by Parbhuji on behalf of the defendants on that date. Parbhuji was also alleged to have signed the debit and credit sides of the previous Khata.

3. According to the plaintiffs further payments were made by the defendants after that date and a balance of Rs. 389-15-0 remained outstanding against them on Kartik Badi 15, Smt. 201 r. The present suit was instituted for the recove









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top