SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Raj) 223

BHARGAVA
Udairam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P. Jain, for petitioner; R.P. Goyal, for State

Bhargava, J.—This is an application in revision by Udairam and Bahadur against their conviction under sec. 447 of the Indian Penal Code. They have been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 400/- each.

2. The dispute between the parties relates to Khasra No. 1233 situate in village Kohrana, District Alwar. It appears that Sheochand complainant had obtained a decree for recovery of possession of this and two other fields against Udairam. In execution of that decree a warrant for delivery of possession was issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, Behror. Before the warrant could be executed, Bahadur who is the brother of Udairam instituted a suit for declaration against Sheochand and in that suit obtained an ex-parte order of temporary injunction restraining the decree-holder from interfering with his possession over the said fields. The order of injunction was also issued from the court of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Behror.

The order regarding delivery of possession was to be executed through the Tehsildar, Behror. It appears that Udairam appeared before the Tehsildar and apprised him of the order of temporary injunction issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Behror against Sheochand on which t





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top