SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Raj) 253

DAVE, CHHANGANI
Satish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Election Tribunal, Alwar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Rastogi, for petitioner; Government Advocate, for respondent Mo. 1; C.L. Agarwal, for respondent Mo. 2

Dave, J.—This is a writ application under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and it arises in the following circumstances:–

2. The petitioners Satish Kumar and respondent No. 2 Badri Prasad and a few others contested the general election held on the 26th February, 1962 from the Bansur Constituency for membership of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly. The petitioner was declared elected as he received the highest number of votes. Respondent No. 2 lost the election. Respondent No. 2 then filed an election petition to challenge the election of the petitioners, before the Election Commission. The said petition was sent for disposal to the Election Tribunal, Alwar, presided over by Shri Syed Ikramul Haq, RHJS. The petitioner in his written statement raised several objection which led the Tribunal to frame more than 58 issues. Out of them 16 issues (Nos. 1, 7, 10, 14, 15, 22 to 25, 31, 36, 40, 54, 55, 57 and 58) were considered by the Tribunal to be preliminary issues and so they were decided on the 18th October, 1962 after hearing both the parties. Issues Nos. 24 and 25 were decided partly in favour of the petitioner and the rest were decided against him. It is against this o














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top