SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Raj) 181

DAVE, CHHANGANI
Noratan Mal – Appellant
Versus
Akhey Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chand Mal Lodha, for appellants; R.R. Chacha, for respondent

Dave, J. —This is a first appeal by the plaintiffs Noratan Mal and Smt. Roop Kanwar, widow of Beenjraj, against the judgment of the learned District Judge, Merta, dated the 23rd October, 1954, dismissing their suit.

2. The suit giving rise to this appeal was originally filed by appellant Noratanmal alone on the 26th September, 1950 and appellant No. 2 Smt. Roop Kanwar was impleaded as a proforma defendant, but on the 17th November, 1950 she was transposed and added as a plaintiff.

3. Their case was that appellant No. 1 was adopted by appellant No. 2 as a son to her deceased husband Beenjraj on the 29th January, 1944 and an adoption deed was executed by her in his favour on the 21st August, 1950. According to them, Beenjraj had left no son at the time of his death. He had brought the respondent Akheychand from Jodhpur to his place at Ladnu with the intention of taking him in adoption if he proved to be obedient and if his conduct was found to be satisfactory. Beenjraj was, however, not satisfied either with the respondents conduct or his faithfulness and so he was not adopted. Before his death in Smt. 1974, Beenjraj permitted appellant No. 2 to adopt some worthy and obedient boy as a
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top