SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Raj) 271

MODI
Balmukand – Appellant
Versus
Jagan Nath – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M. Vyas, for appellants; Chandmal Lodha and Kishore Singh Lodha, for respondent

Modi, J.—This is a plaintiffs second appeal against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Ganganagar dated the 11th July, 1957, affirming the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge Suratgarh dated the 19th March, 1956, dismissing the plaintiffs suit for recovery of damages in circumstances presently to be mentioned.

2. The plaintiffs, father and son, carried on business as commission agents in the name and style of Balmukand Dharamchand at Raisinghnagar. It is alleged that this was a joint Hindu family firm. The defendant who was a Patwari at Raisinghnagar some time before the present suit was brought had an account with the plaintiffs in which he used to deposit monies from time to time. The plaintiffs case was that between the 25th April, 1951, and the 25th June, 1951, the defendant placed an oral order for the purchase of 200 bags of Sarson under their commission agency. These were accordingly purchased at a price of Rs. 12,343/-/6, and this sum was debited against the defendant. On the 20th August, 1951, the defendant paid Rs. 3475/-to the plaintiffs of which a sum of Rs.2977/2/6 was paid out of his aforesaid personal account with the plaintiffs, and the relevant entry







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top