SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Raj) 38

DAVE, TYAGI
Mukat Behari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Z.S. Meratwal, for petitioner; Chandmal, for respondent

Dave, J. —This is a reference by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench C) under sec. 66(1) of the Income Tax Act.

2. The question which has been referred to us is as follows: —

"Whether the income from property has been properly included in the assessment of Shri Mukat Behari Lal Bhargava for the year 1957-58."

3. In order to appreciate the question of law involved in the reference, it would be proper to set out, in brief, the facts which have given rise to it.

4. Shri Mukat Beharilal Bhargava is the adopted s/o Shri Binodilal Bhargava. The said adoption took place about 40 years back. Shri Binodilal expired in the year 1937 leaving behind him, his adopted son Shri Mukat Beharilal whose wife gave birth to a daughter in 1942. Shri Binodilal had left certain ancestral properties at the time of his death. The income from these properties was assessed as that of an individual i.e. of Shri Mukat Beharilal Bhargava upto the assessment year 1955-56. In the returns which were filed for the assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58 the income from these properties was shown as that of a Hindu undivided family. For the assessment year 1957-58 i.e. the financial year ending on 31.3.1957, the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top