SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Raj) 19

BERI
Dhan Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Badri Prasad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Jindal, for appellants; R.P. Goyal, for respondent

Beri, J.—This is a plaintiffs second appeal directed against the judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge, Ajmer, dated 20th August, 1959, whereby he dismissed the suit of the plaintiffs on the ground that they had no locus standi to bring this action.

2. Dhan Singh Yadav and Ramdayal Sakarwal were employees of the General Post Office, Ajmer, in 1951. In the course of their official duty they were responsible for making payment of six 5 Years Cash Certificates of the value of Rs. 1,000/- each. These certificates were purchased on 13th September, 1937 and by process of renewal they were to mature after 15 years. The holder of these certificates Badri Parsad, defendant in this case, presented them at the General Post Office, Ajmer, on 20th September, 1951, when only 14 years had elapsed. Dhan Singh Yadav and Ramdayal Sakarwal, however, on account of an error in calculation treated these certificates to have completed 15 years and thus paid Badri Parsad an excess amount in the sum of Rs. 487/8/-. It appears that in October, 1951, the error was discovered and by a letter of 22nd October, 1951 (Ex. A. 2) defendant Badri Parsad was informed by the Post Office to refund the excess pay








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top