SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Raj) 35

MODI
Dhanraj – Appellant
Versus
Hirachand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Lekhraj Mehta, for appellant; Shri Kishenmal Lodha, for respondent

Modi, J.—This is yet another case of the type with which I have had to deal recently wherein the appeal must be allowed on the short ground that the judgment produced by the learned Judge of the first appellate court is not at all a judgment in accordance with law.

2. The appeal arises out of a suit for malicious prosecution. It appears that there was some election in village Dalai, and that was the cause of bad blood between the plaintiff Dhanraj and his associates on the one hand and Hirachand defendant on the other. On the 14th June, 1956, the defendant lodged a complaint against the plaintiff and thirteen other persons in the court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jalore, for offences under sec. 452, 323 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegations that there was considerable bad blood between the parties, and that on the 12th June, 1956, at about 8 or 9 P.M. when the defendant was sleeping in his Pol, all the accused including the plaintiff came in a body and entered into the Pol, that they were all armed with lathis and were actuated by a common intention to beat him, that out of the plaintiffs party, two persons, namely, the plaintiff and one other person Bhagwana bea




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top