SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DAVE, CHHANGANI
Pooranchand – Appellant
Versus
Shriram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Raj Narain with S.R. Biswas, for appellants; S.K. Jindal with H.L. Mehra, for respondents

Dave, J.—This is an appeal by the defendants against the judgment and final decree passed by the learned Senior Civil judge, Ajmer, on 24th October, 1960.

2. It involves two ticklish questions of law and in order to appreciate them properly, it seems necessary to narrate the facts which have given rise to them,

3. All the four appellants are real brothers, being sons of one Mst. Sardha Devi alias Sardhamani who is no longer alive. Between the years 1936 and 1939, their mother obtained loans from one Ramdhan, father of respondents No. 1 and 2, and executed four mortgage-deeds on different dates. Ramdhan brought a suit for recovery of the entire mortgage-money secured by all the said documents, against the present appellants on 14th March, 1946, in the court of Sub Judge, Ajmer. That suit was at the request of the, parties, referred by the court to the arbitration of two persons, namely, Sri Daya Shanker and Devi Dayal who were respectively counsel for plaintiff and the defendants in the suit. The arbitrators gave their award on 21st December, 1949, The operative portion of the award ran as follows :—

"The plaintiffs claim is deceased for Rs. 5,000/-, principal sum, and Rs. 3,793/- on a





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top