SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Raj) 234

JAGAT NARAYAN
Hari Ram – Appellant
Versus
Collector Bikaner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sagarmal and S.N. Prosad, for Petitioners; Kishore Singh, for Respondents Nos. 4 and 5

JAGAT NARAYAN, J.—This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the retirement proceedings held by Shri Karnail Singh respondent No. 6 at which the two petitioners Hariram and Hazariram, members of Sadhasar Nyaya Panchayat, were retired. The petition has been contested on behalf of Gadh Singh and Begaram respondents Nos. 4 and 5 who are the remaining Nyaya Panchas.

2. Sec. 27G(7) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act lays down that as nearly as possible, one-third of the members of a Nyaya Panchayat shall retire by rotation, as soon as may be, on the expiration of every second year in accordance with rules made in that behalf by the State Government. The following rules of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyaya Panchayat Election R. 1960 are relevant in this connection—

R. 64. When members of a Nyaya Panchayat to retire—(1) ..................

(2) The Deputy District Development Officer shall, every second year, determine the number of members of a Nyaya Panchayat that shall retire upon the expiry of that year as provided in sub-sec. (7) of sec. 27C.

R 65. Meeting for determining members of Nyaya Panchayats to retire first—(1) Before the expiration of two years from the date of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top