SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 3

MODI, CHHANGANI
Kishan Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Surajmal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sagarmal, for Appellants; Utsavlal Gupta, for Respondents

MODI, J.—This is a miscellaneous appeal by Kishan Gopal and four others against an order of adjudication passed by the District Judge, Kotah, dated the 20th August, 1960, in an insolvency matter, and raised an interesting question of law as to whether all the members of a joint Hindu trading family can be adjudicated as insolvents irrespective of the consideration whether their liability to discharge the family debts is personal or not.

2. The material facts may be shortly stated as follows. Appellants Nos. 1 to 3 are the sons of one Bhanwarlal, and the latters remaining son Kunwarlal has been impleaded as respondent No. 18 in this appeal. Appellants Nos. 4 and 5 are the sons of Kunwarlal. Bhanwarlal died during the pendency of this litigation in the trial Court. Respondent Surajmal and certain others moved an application against the appellants and Kunwarlal and Bhanwarlal in the Court of the District Judge, Kotah, alleging that the latter carried on a joint Hindu family business in the name of M/s Ganeshram Bhanwarlal in the town of Kotah,that the said Kunwarlal was the managing member thereof, that they were indebted to the respondents and certain other creditors, the total indebt














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top