SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 94

BHANDARI
Sridhar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Not available

BHANDARI, J.—This is a reference by the Sessions Judge, Ajmer recommending that the order dated 4th of December, 1963 of the City Magistrate, Ajmer refusing to take on record unstamped affidavit filed by the parties in the proceedings under sec. 145 Cr. P.C. be set aside. The City Magistrate took the view that such affidavits required to be stamped under the Rajasthan Stamp Law (Adaptation) Act, 1952. Under the Rajasthan Stamp Law (Adaptation) Act, 1952, an affidavit when made "for the immediate purpose of being filed or used in any Court or before the officer of any Court" is exempt from the payment of any stamp duty. Immediate purpose means direct purpose, and if the direct purpose of making an affidavit is that it is to be filed in any Court or before the officer of any Court, such an affidavit is exempt from the payment of stamp duty. In this case, there is no doubt that the affidavits were made for the purpose of filing in a Court of law under proceedings under sec. 145 Cr. P.C. In this view of the matter, the view taken by the City Magistrate that the affidavits required to be stamped was wrong. The recommendation made by the Sessions Judge, Ajmer proceeds on the correct view
Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top