SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 203

DAVE, KAN SINGH
Poonamchand – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Board, Jhalawar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.M. Lodha, Advocate, for Petitioners; C.L. Agarwal Advocate, for Non-petitioners

KAN SINGH, J.—This is writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution directed against an order of the Revenue Appellate Authority, Kota, dated 6.5.64, whereby in exercise of its revisional powers under sec. 300 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959, hereinafter to be called the "1959 Act", it set aside an appellate order of the Collector, Jhalawar and restored that of the Municipal Board, Jhalawar, by which the Board had ordered the demolition of two shops alleged to have been constructed by the petitioners in Bada Bazar, Jhalawar, in contravention of the permission granted by the Municipal Board.

2. The petitioners were the owners of three shops in what is known as the Bada Bazar in the town of Jhalawar. They wanted to construct two bigger shops in place of the three, shops and, therefore, they applied to the Municipal Board on 18.6.63 for granting them permission for the same and by its order dated 15.7.63, the Municipal Board granted the permision for the construction subject to the condition imposed by its aforesaid order. Here, in the present writ petition, we are concerned with one condition which is alleged to have been contravened and it was to the effect that the peti






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top