SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 237

JAGAT NARAYAN
Pukhraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N. Joshi, for Petitioner; M. M. Vyas, Government Advocate for State of Rajasthan

JAGAT NARAYAN, J.—This is a writ petition by one Pukhraj Sarpanch of Badgaon Panchayat against an order of the State Government dated 3-6-64 suspending him under sec. 17(4-A) of the Panchayat Act.

2. On a requisition by the State Government the Collector of Sirohi held a preliminary exparte inquiry against the petitioner under r. 20 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyaya Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961 and submitted a report to the effect that certain charges of embezzlement had been prima facie established against him. On receipt of the report of the Collector the State Government sent a notice to the petitioner on 20-5-64 enclosing a list of the charges and asking him to show cause in writing why an inquiry should not be held on those charges. He was asked to submit his reply by 3-6-64. According to the State Government the petitioner submitted his reply on 20-7-64. But according to the petitioner he sent it before 3-6-64. An acknowledgment receipt has been filed which goes to show that a communication was received from the petitioner by the State Government on 1-6-64. From his affidavit and from this acknowledgment receipt I infer that the reply of the petitioner was received by th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top