SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Raj) 113

DAVE, KAN SINGH
Sharma Roadways – Appellant
Versus
Sohanlal Soni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal Lodha, for Appellant; D.P. Gupta and M. Fashuddin, for Respondents

DAVE, C.J.—This is a special appeal by Sharma Roadways under sec. 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, against the judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court dated 20th April, 1965.

2. The facts, which are no longer in dispute between the parties, are as follows:—

The petitioner was a bus operator on the route Taranagar to Sadulpur in Bikaner region. He was holding two permits on that route. There were eight other permit holders on the same route. Besides this route, there was another route from Sardarsahar to Taranagar and there were five permit holders on that route. Four persons including respondent No. 1 Sohanlal and respondent No. 2 Messrs Goldsmith Transport Company applied for one permit each to the Regional Transport Authority, Bikaner, on Sardarsahar to Sadulpur route. This Sardarsahar to Sadulpur route was nothing but a combination of the routes mentioned above, namely, Sardarsahar to Taranagar and Taranagar to Sadulpur. The substance of the said four applications was published in the Rajasthan Rajpatra dated 8th October, 1964. These applications came to be considered by the Regional Transport Authority on 14th December, 1964 and the applications of respond






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top