SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Raj) 197

SHINGHAL
Khinwa Singh – Appellant
Versus
Nemi Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C. Inani, for Appellant; B.L. Panwar, for Respondent

SHINGHAL, J.—Plaintiff Khinwasingh, who is the appellant, admittedly purchased a she-buffalo from defendant Nemisingh on Mangsir Badi 7, Smt. 2009 (Novembers, 1952), for Rs. 400/- and took its delivery. About a week later, the police found that the buffalo belonged to one Pannalal who had entrusted it to the custody of one Paudan Singh and that Paudan Singh was guilty of criminal breach of trust in selling the buffalo to Nemisingh. The police therefore seized the buffalo from the plaintiffs custody on November 15, 1952, and it is admitted that the plaintiff has not been able to regain its possession. He therefore instituted the present suit for the recovery of Rs. 400/- on account of the failure of the consideration and Rs 100/- by way of damages. According to the plaintiff, the defendant knew all along that the buffalo belonged to Pannalal Baheti of Karel, who had entrusted it to Paudan Singh and that the defendant falsely represented to the plaintiff, for the purpose of cheating him that he had purchased the buffalo from Paudansingh as it belonged to him. Defendant Nemisingh resisted the suit and took the plea that he had purchased the buffalo from Paudan Singh on Bhadwa Badi 5,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top