SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Raj) 167

JAGAT NARAYAN
Karnidan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Civil Judge, Bikaner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Purohit, for Petitioner; Shridhar Kalla, for Respondent No. 2

JAGAT NARAYAN, J.—This is a petition by one Karnidan Singh against an order of the Civil Judge, Bikaner, holding that he has jurisdiction to hear the election petition, which has been transferred to him by the order of the District Judge, Bikaner.

2. Mangalchand respondent filed an election petition before the District Judge, Bikaner, on 29.1.64 challenging the election of Karnidan Singh to Ward No. 11 of the Bikaner Municipal Council. On 31.1.1964 the District Judge passed an order transferring the petition for trial to the Civil Judge, Bikaner, without recording any reason. Sec. 40 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 runs as follows—

40. Who shall hear petition. — (1) An election petition may be presented to and shall be heard by—

(a) the District Judge, sitting at the place where the municipal office is situated.

(b) where there is no such District Judge, the Civil Judge, so sitting, or

(c) any other Judge specially appointed by the State Government for the purpose.

Provided that, where an election petition is presented as aforesaid to a District Judge, he may for reasons to be recorded in writing transfer the same for hearing and disposal to a Civil Judge, subordinate to him an








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top