SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Raj) 156

DAVE, KAN SINGH
Ranjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
University of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal Lodha, for Petitioner; C.L. Agarwal, for Respondents

KAN SINGH, J.—This is a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution by one Ranjeet Singh challenging the validity of a notification dated 10.8.64, issued by the University of Rajasthan, whereby the University cancelled the examination taken by the petitioner in 1964, and also debarred him from appearing at any subsequent examinations of the University to be held in three succeeding years.

2. The petitioner was a student of the Second Year Three-Degree Course (Science) at the University of Rajasthan. He sat at the Second Year Examination held by the University in April, 1964, at the Bikaner centre. On 6.4.64, the petitioner answered his Mathematics Paper No. 1. His case is that after answering the paper he went to his house, but soon thereafter he was called by the Principal, Doongar College, to his office. Accordingly, the petitioner presented himself before the Principal who then told him that one of the invigilators Shri Jag Mohan Mittal had complained against the petitioner that he had used unfair means at the time of answering the question paper of that day. The petitioner replied that the allegation was completely wrong and he had not used any unfair means at the examinati

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top