SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Raj) 194

BHANDARI
Chunnilal – Appellant
Versus
Vaspujaiji Maharaj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Not Available

BHANDARI, J.—These Civil Second Appeals arise out of suits filed for eject-ment and arrears of rent by the various landlords against their respective tenants. Some of these suits have been dismissed either wholly or partly, and some of them have been decreed either wholly or partly by the lower appellate court. The landlords have come in appeal in cases where the suits had been dismissed either wholly or partly while the tenants have filed appeal in this court in cases where the suit has been decreed either wholly or partly. In all these cases, the point for decision is, "whether a tenant who has committed default in the payment of the rent and who has been held not entitled to take advantage of the provisions of Sec. 13 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter called the Act) can take benefit of Sec. 13-A which was inserted in the Act by the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Amendment Act (No. 12 of 1965) (hereinafter called the Amending Act). The amending Act received the assent of the President on 2nd June, 1965 and was published for general information in the Rajasthan Gazettee Extra-ordinary dated 9.6.65. There is no doubt tha




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top