SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Raj) 159

BHANDARI
Noratmal – Appellant
Versus
Mohanlal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P. Gupta, for Appellants; Ganpat Singh, for Respondent

BHANDARI, J.—This is a Civil Second Appeal on behalf of the plaintiff in a suit for ejectment and arrears of rent. The following facts may be taken to be proved for the purposes of the decision of this appeal.

2. The premises No.AMC.III/344 situate in Chhoti Chowdhar Gali, Ajmer belonged to Sethani Prabhabati Kanwar and the plaintiff-appellant purchased this property from her on 6th January 1955. One Debilal Sunar was the tenant of Sethani Prabhabati Kanwar of the said premises and before the sale he had sub-let part of the premises held by him as tenant to Mohanlal defendant at the rate of Rs. 3/8/-per mensem. After the sale of the premises by Sethani Prabhabati Kanwar, Debilal Sunar served the defendant with a notice dated 23rd July 1956 asking him to pay rent directly to the plaintiff in future and to treat the plaintiff as his landlord for all purposes with effect from the date of the sale deed. The plaintiff brought the suit for ejectment of the defendant alleging that the defendant had become his tenant by operation of law. He also claimed rent at Rs. 4/7/- per mensem as according to him he had spent some money on repairing the premises about which the suit was filed. The tria




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top