1966 Supreme(Raj) 80
Rajasthan High Court
Bhandari & Bhargava, JJ.
Suraj Mal Singhvi - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
D.B. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 407 of 1962
Decided On : March 30, 1966
M.P. Amin with G.M. Lodha, Girraj Desai, H.H. Dalai, Hastimal, Pukhraj and J.S. Rastogi, for Petitioner; G.C. Kasliwal, Advocate General & M.M. Vyas, Govt. Advocate for Opposite parties
Headnote:(a) Constitution of India, Arts.25 and 26—Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, Sec. 30—Swetamber Mandi Margi scriptures forbidding expenditure on forbidden purposes—Deposit of money in bank not encroachment on Jain religion.(b) Constitution of India, Arts. 25 and 26—Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, Sec. 31—Section not ultra vires of Constitution.(c) Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, Sec. 17(3) and Rule made under—Charge of Rs. 5/- is tax not fee and so ultra vires of the powers of legislature.(d) Constitution of India, Arts.25 and 26—Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, Chapter X— Provisions not ultra vires.(e) Constitution of India, Arts.25 and 26—Rajasthan Trusts Act, Sec 51(2) —Provisions not ultra vires.(f) Constitution of India, Art.25 and 26—Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, Sec, 52(1) clauses (a) (b) (c) Clauses (a)(b)(c) not ultra vires as same applicable to those trusts which are already under State management. ](g) Constitution of India, Arts.25 and 26 -Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, Sec. 52 — Management and protection of property — Religious injunction not against secular management—Such management always to be carried out in accordance with law of the land.(h) Constitution of India, Arts.25 and 26—Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, Sec. 52(1) clauses (d) and (e) and Sec. 53(4) (5) — Clauses (d) and (e) of Sec. 52(1) ultra vires of Art. of Constitution.
2. The Rajasthan State Legislature enacted the Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, 1959 (Act No. 42 of 1959) (hereinafter called the Act) which received the assent of the President on 22nd October, 1959 and was published in the Rajasthan Gazette Extra Ordinary Pt. IV-A, dated 28th October, 1959. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the various provisions of the Acton the ground that they are in direct and flagrant breach of fundamental right of religious freedom and freedom of conscience of the Jains and their right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion and imposes unreasonable restrictions on the rights of religious denomination to maintain and manage religious institutions and to manage their own affairs in the matter of religion and to administer their property according to Jain Shsan rules and regulations.
3. In order to appreciate the contentions of the petitioner it is proper to refer to the provisions of the Act which are being challenged in this writ petition. Sec.2 (11) which defines "public trust", 2(13) defines "religious endowment" or "endowment", 2(14) defines "religious institution" or "institution", 2(15) "Specific endowment" and 2(16) "temple" in the following manner:
2(11). "Public trust" means an express or constructive trust for either a public religious or charitable purpose or both and includes a temple, a math, dharmada or any other religious or charitable endowment or institution and a society formed either for a religious or charitable purpose or for both;
2(13). "religious endowment" or "endowment" means all property belonging to or given or endowed for the support of a religious institution or given or endowed for the performance of any service or charity connected therewith and includes the premises of the religio