SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Raj) 175

JAGAT NARAYAN
Bansidhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M. Tiwari and Dr. S. K. Tiwari, for Petitioner

JAGAT NARAYAN, J.—This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution by one Bansidhar challenging the validity of a motion of no confidence which was declared to have been passed against him. The petition has been contested by 9 Panchas who voted for the no-confidence motion.

2. Under sec. 4 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 the strength * of the Panchayat has been determined at one Sarpanch and 12 Panchas. On the date of the no-confidence motion there were only 11 Panchas in the Panchayat, as one Panch named Ramsi had been removed under sec. 17(2). Nine Panchas voted for the motion of no-confidence. Sec. 19 lays down that a motion of no-confidence can only be said to be carried if it is carried by a majority of not less than 3/4th of the total number of members of the Panchayat including the Sarpanch,, but excluding the associate Panchas.

3. If the phrase "total number of members" signifies the total strength of the Panchayat as fixed under sec. 4 then before a motion of no-confidence can be said to have been carried 10 Panchas should vote for it. If on the other hand the phrase means the total number of members holding office for the time being then the motion of no-confidenc












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top