SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Raj) 231

MODI
Ganesh Mal – Appellant
Versus
Meghraj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.B.L. Sharma, for Appellants; Meghraj Kistoor Mal Singhvi, for Respondent

MODI, J.—This is a civil regular second appeal by the defendants Ganeshmal and Tarachand alias Otmal against an order of the learned Civil Judge, Sirohi, dated the 1st March, 1961, by which he set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs suit as barred by time and remanded it back to the Munsiff for disposing of it on the merits.

2. This was, to start with, a simple suit under O.21, r. 63 C.P.C. which was instituted in the court of the Munsiff Sirohi on the 18th July, 1957, and has had a chequered history principally because it has been mis-handled by the parties and the courts below and the court of first appeal in particular (Mr. Sardar Singh Civil Judge, Sirohi). The plaintiff Nathmal and his son Meghraj alias Maganlal obtained a money decree against defendant No. 2 in this appeal and took out execution thereof. They attached two houses alleging them to be of the judgment-debtor Pratapchand, the description whereof was given in paragraph 2 of the plaint. Defendants respondents Ganeshmal and Tarachand alias Otmal raised on objection before the execution court under O.21, r. 58 C.P.C. to the effect that the said houses had been mortgaged to them by


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top