SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Raj) 69

DAVE, L.S.MEHTA
Maji Mohan Kanwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N. Dutt, for Petitioners; Rajnarain, Deputy Government Advocate, for Respondents

DAVE, C.J.—This is a writ application under Art, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of the orders of the Board of Revenue dated 5th December, 1958, 28th June, 1963, 6th March, 1964 and 2nd December, 1964. In order to appreciate the question which arises for our determination, it would be proper to state briefly the facts giving rise to this petition.

2. Thakur Balsingh son of Thakur Bijay Singhji was a jagirdar of thikana Ladhu which was resumed under the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Acs,, 1952 (Act No. VI, of 1952), which will hereinafter be referred as the Act. After the resumption of the jagir, Thakur Balsingh filed a claim for compensation and rehabilitation grant under the Act. The final award on that claim was given by the Jagir Commissioner on 23.2.57. Thereafter Th. Balsingh died on 5.3.57. Against the said final award and an order dated 13.3.57, the State preferred an appeal before the Board of Revenue for Rajasthan. In that appeal the legal representatives of the deceased (including six petitioners before this Court) were impleaded as respondents. The said appeal was dismissed by a Division Bench of the Board of Revenue on












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top