LODHA
Nanuram – Appellant
Versus
Vishwamitra – Respondent
2. It is the admitted case of the parties that the plaintiffs-non-petitioners sold their standing crop in the field situate in village Dhanni to the defendant petitioner for a consideration of Rs. 500/- in cash, one maund of Bajri and one cartload of Pala. Since the defendant did not pay the amount, nor gave the stipulated Bajri and Pala, the plaintiffs filed this suit in the court of the Munsiff, Didwana for recovery of Rs. 500/- in cash and Rs. 253/14/6 as interest thereon, Rs. 32/- as cost of the stipulated Pala, Rs. 16/- as cost of one maund of Bajra and Rs. 10/- on account of Bighori= Total Rs. 811-14-6. The defendants contended that this transaction took place not in Sambat 2017, as alleged by the plaintiffs, but in Smt. 2016, and thus a material alteration in the Smt. year had been made by the plaintiffs in the suit document (Ex.1) in order to bring the suit within limitation. It was further pleaded that the defendant had made full payment and had also delivered the stipulated Bajri and Pala and nothing was due, and this
(1) Sajanlal & Co. vs. Gulabchand Keshrichand (AIR 1953 Bom. 123)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.