SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Raj) 39

LODHA
Nanuram – Appellant
Versus
Vishwamitra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.L. Maheshwari, for Petitioner; N.M. Singhvi, for Non-petitioners

LODHA, J —The defendant Nanuram has filed this Revision application from the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Merta dated 7-4-1966 in a money suit.

2. It is the admitted case of the parties that the plaintiffs-non-petitioners sold their standing crop in the field situate in village Dhanni to the defendant petitioner for a consideration of Rs. 500/- in cash, one maund of Bajri and one cartload of Pala. Since the defendant did not pay the amount, nor gave the stipulated Bajri and Pala, the plaintiffs filed this suit in the court of the Munsiff, Didwana for recovery of Rs. 500/- in cash and Rs. 253/14/6 as interest thereon, Rs. 32/- as cost of the stipulated Pala, Rs. 16/- as cost of one maund of Bajra and Rs. 10/- on account of Bighori= Total Rs. 811-14-6. The defendants contended that this transaction took place not in Sambat 2017, as alleged by the plaintiffs, but in Smt. 2016, and thus a material alteration in the Smt. year had been made by the plaintiffs in the suit document (Ex.1) in order to bring the suit within limitation. It was further pleaded that the defendant had made full payment and had also delivered the stipulated Bajri and Pala and nothing was due, and this




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top