SHINGHAL
Laxmichand – Appellant
Versus
Chainmal – Respondent
2. Even though the suit in the present case was instituted on July 22, 1958, the parties have been fighting for their respective claims for a period of over 20 years. The reason is that while the plaintiffs have made the claim that their father Jalamchand purchased the suit land bearing survey No. 1990, and the other piece of land bearing survey No. 1939, in Sirohi town, from Samarthmal, father of defendants Lakhpatraj, Dalpatraj and Sajjanraj by sale-deed Ex. 1 dated July 22, 1946, and took possession thereunder, defendant Chainmal has been resisting the claim to the suit land (No. 1990) on the ground that it belonged to his ancestor Dhanna Ramji under "sanad" Ex. A5 dated July 25,1897. The dispute arose because after purchasing the land from Samarthmal, Jalamchand filed an application the same day for the issue of a "sanad" in accordance with the provisions of the Sirohi State Building Sites Sanad Rules, 1935. A notice inviting objections was therefore issued in t
(4) Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. vs. Union of India (AIR 1963 SC 953)
(5) Bengal Nagpur Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. Board of Revenue M.P. (AIR 1964 SC 888)
(6) Madhaorao Phalke vs. State of M.B. (AIR 1961 SC 298)
(7) Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj etc. vs. State of Raj. (AIR 1963 SC 1638)
(8) Raj Kumer Narsingh Pratap Singh Deo vs. State of Orissa (AIR 1964 SC 1793)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.