DAVE, KAN SINGH
Ganeshmal – Appellant
Versus
Anand Kanwar – Respondent
2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows:
One Raj Narain Mathur obtained a money decree for Rs. 37,086/15/- from the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Ajmer, on 29 4-60 against the present appellant Ganeshmal. He took out execution of the said decree, but before it could be satisfied, he expired on 16-12-60. Thereafter an application under sec. 146 read with O. 21, r. 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed on 7-1-61 by his widow Smt. Anand Kumar, his seven sons and two daughters and another similar application was filed by his remaining three daughters at 18-2-61 and therein it was prayed that they be substituted as the legal representatives of the deceased and also be allowed to proceed with the execution petition filed by Rajnarain. These applications were opposed by the judgment-debtor on three grounds, but these objections were repelled by the executing court and it was ordered that the names of the twelve applicants be substituted in place of the deceased and that the e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.