SHINGHAL
Mohanlal – Appellant
Versus
Durga Prashad – Respondent
2. The suit house is situated in Ajmer. Plaintiff Durga Prashad and pro-forma-defendant Raghunath Agarwal purchased that house from Mrs. S.R. Smith for Rs. 5,000/- under sale-deed Ex. A/1/5/5 dated October 4, 1946. Thereafter Durga Prashad and Raghunath Agarwal purchased a two-third share in the same house from G. M. Peters & G. V. Peters on November 9, 1946, for Rs. 5,000/- under sale-deed Ex. 6. Mohanlal and others, the contesting defendants, filed civil suit No. 67 of 1947 on February 5, 1947, laying a claim for pre-emption in respect of the sale made by Mrs. S. H. Smith. The suit was decreed in favour of the pre-emptors by judgment Ex. A. 1/5/1 dated July 33, 1951 which became final as no appeal was filed against it. The pre-emptors therefore became entitled to substitution in place of the present plaintiff and Raghunath Agarwal on payment of Rs. 5000/-. During the pendency of that suit, contesting defendants Mohanlal and others instituted another suit (No. 825 of 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.