SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Raj) 24

JAGAT NARAYAN
Fateh Raj – Appellant
Versus
Suraj Roop – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal Lodha, for Petitioners; Hasti Mal, for Respondent No.1; Bhawani Sahai, for Respondent No. 2

JAGAT NARAYAN, J.—This is a revision application by Fateh Raj and Vijai Raj against an order of Munsif City, Jodhpur, refusing to implead them as defendants in a suit brought by Suraj Roop respondent against the Municipal Council Jodhpur, for a declaration that he is the owner of a Chabutri described in the plaint under order 1 rule 10(2) C.P.C. on the ground that they do not claim any interest in the property in suit.

2. The houses of Vijajraj and Fatehraj on the one hand and of Surajroop on the other abut one another at right angles. There is a Chabutri situated at the place where the two houses meet. This Chabutri was constructed by the plaintiff. The case of the plaintiff is that it is a very old Chabutri. Vijairaj filed a complaint before the Administrator, Municipal Council on 29th December 1961 alleging that the Chabutri was a new encroachment made by the Suraj Roop. After hearing the parties the Municipal Commissioner held that part of the Chabutri was new and was an encroachment and ordered its demolition on 1-10-6. That order was subsequently set aside by the Revenue Appellate Authority. Vijai Raj filed a writ petition in this Court on which the order of the Revenu Appella








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top