L.S.MEHTA, LODHA
Namamal – Appellant
Versus
Radhey Shyam – Respondent
2. The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated within a short compass :
3. The plaintiff-respondent Radheyshyam (landlord) filed a suit for arrears of rent and ejectment from a shop situated in Ramganj Bazar. Jaipur, against the defendant-appellants Namamal and others (tenants) on two grounds viz. that the defendants have not paid rent of the premises for more than twelve months and that the premises are required reasonably and bonafide by the landlord for his own occupation. The landlords plea for personal necessity was rejected by the trial court. However the suit for arrears of rent and ejectment was decreed on the ground that the defendant-tenants had committed default in payment of rent and had thereby incurred the liability to be ejected. On appeal by the defendants the learned Senior Civil Judge, Jaipur set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court and dismissed the su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.