SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Raj) 2

L.S.MEHTA, LODHA
Namamal – Appellant
Versus
Radhey Shyam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Rastogi and H.C. Rastogi, for Appellants; P.C. Bhandari and A.K. Bhandari, for Respondent

LODHA, J.—This appeal has been brought by certificate granted under sec. 18 (2) of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance from the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 18th March, 1966 in S. B. Civil Misc. Application No. 61 of 1965 (in S. B. Civil Regular Second Appeal No. 452 of 1960).

2. The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated within a short compass :

3. The plaintiff-respondent Radheyshyam (landlord) filed a suit for arrears of rent and ejectment from a shop situated in Ramganj Bazar. Jaipur, against the defendant-appellants Namamal and others (tenants) on two grounds viz. that the defendants have not paid rent of the premises for more than twelve months and that the premises are required reasonably and bonafide by the landlord for his own occupation. The landlords plea for personal necessity was rejected by the trial court. However the suit for arrears of rent and ejectment was decreed on the ground that the defendant-tenants had committed default in payment of rent and had thereby incurred the liability to be ejected. On appeal by the defendants the learned Senior Civil Judge, Jaipur set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court and dismissed the su










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top