SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Raj) 122

LODHA
Madanlal – Appellant
Versus
Manakchand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C. Bhoot, for Appellant; P.N. Dutt, for Respondent

LODHA, J —This is a defendants second appeal arising out of a suit for eviction and arrears of rent.

2. One Awani Kumar Mukerjee owned two shops Nos. 66 and 57 situated on the station road, Jaipur. Behind these shops there is a latrine and bath room. It is alleged by the plaintiff Manakchand that he purchased the aforesaid property from Awani Kumar Mukerjee on 26-7-62 for a sum of Rs. 10,500/- by a registered sale-deed. Defendant Madanlal was at that time occupying the premises in question as a tenant of Awani Kumar Mukerjee at a monthly rent of Rs. 25/-, in pursuance of a rent note alleged to have been executed by the defendants father dated 1st of June, 1953. It is averred in para No. 3 of the plaint that this rent note was for one year and on the expiry of this period of one year the defendants father became a statutory tenant. It is further alleged that after the death of defendants father Devi Sahai, the defendant continued to occupy the premises in question in the capacity of a tenant. The plaintiffs case is that he requires the shops for his bonafide and personal necessity as he himself was residing in a rented house and was paying rent @ Rs 75/- per mensem and consequently h























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top