JAGAT NARAYAN
Jagdish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Roopchand – Respondent
2. The plaintiff filed the present suit for eviction inter alia on the ground of default on 20-3 67. On the first day of hearing the court passed an order under sec. 13(4) determining the arrears of rent payable upto date together with interest and the amount was duly deposited by the defendants in court on the same day. But the defendants were required under sec 13(4) to continue to deposit or pay month by month by the 15th of each succeeding month a sum equivalent to the rent at the rate at which it was paid in the past. The defendants committed default in paying or depositing rent for the months of May 1967 and November, 1967, and therefore their defence was struck out.
3. On behalf of the defendants it is contended that the rent for May, 1967 fell due on 15-6-67 when the civil courts were closed for the summer vacations. The defendants sent the rent for May 1967 by money order on 6 6-67 which was refused by th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.