SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Raj) 102

JAGAT NARAYAN
Bhanwar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Kanta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.M. Kasliwal, for Petitioner; P.N. Datt, for Respondents

JAGAT NARAYAN, J.—This is a revision application by the defendant against an appellate order of the Additional District Judge No. 1, holding that the provision of sec. 13 (4) is applicable to the present suit so far as the eviction on the ground of default is concerned and the provision of sec. 13 A is not applicable because it was open to the defendant to get benefit under sec. 13 (4). The trial court held that sec. 13 A was applicable.

2. The suit for recovery of arrears of rent and eviction was filed on 8-3-65. Summons on the defendant-applicant was served on 26-3-65 and the first date of hearing was 16-7-65. On 9-6-65 the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Amendment Act 12 of 1965 came into force in which two provisions were incorporated relating to a suit for eviction based on the ground of default. One was contained in s. 13 (4) and the other was contained in s. 13 A. The provision in sec. 13 (4) was general and was to apply to all suits. The provision under sec. 13 A was a special provision relating to pending suits. Under s.13 (4) the tenant has to deposit the arrears of rent due upto the date of deposit and to deposit future rent month by month till the disposa









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top