SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Raj) 114

LODHA
Gudarmal – Appellant
Versus
Bansilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.M. Parakh, for Appellant; M.L. Shrimal, for Respondents

LODHA, J.—This is a defendants second appeal arising out of a suit for redemption of a house situated in village Giri, District Pali.

2. Plaintiff Banshilal originally filed this suit alleging that the house in question belonged to Fojmal and his sons Kundanmal and Mishrilal, and that the same had been mortgaged by widow of Fojmal, Kundanmal and Mishrilal on Sawan Badi I, Smt 1961 for a sum of Rs. 72 with Ummadmal Ghasiram and Sugan Chand, ancestors of the defendant Budarmal. It was alleged that Mst. Rami respondent No. 2 was the sole surviving heir in Fojmals family and was, therefore, entitled to redeem the house in question It was further averred that Mst. Rami had sold away the equity of redemption in favour of the plaintiff on Maha Sud 18, Smt. 2013 for Rs 99. It was, therefore, prayed that a decree for possession of the house in question by redemption of the mortgage may be granted in favour of the plaintiff. Subsequently the plaint was amended and Mst Rami was also joined as a plaintiff and it was prayed that if for any reason the sale of equity of redemption by Mst. Rami is not recognised, the decree for redemption may be granted in favour of Rami. The suit was resisted by t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top