LODHA
Gudarmal – Appellant
Versus
Bansilal – Respondent
2. Plaintiff Banshilal originally filed this suit alleging that the house in question belonged to Fojmal and his sons Kundanmal and Mishrilal, and that the same had been mortgaged by widow of Fojmal, Kundanmal and Mishrilal on Sawan Badi I, Smt 1961 for a sum of Rs. 72 with Ummadmal Ghasiram and Sugan Chand, ancestors of the defendant Budarmal. It was alleged that Mst. Rami respondent No. 2 was the sole surviving heir in Fojmals family and was, therefore, entitled to redeem the house in question It was further averred that Mst. Rami had sold away the equity of redemption in favour of the plaintiff on Maha Sud 18, Smt. 2013 for Rs 99. It was, therefore, prayed that a decree for possession of the house in question by redemption of the mortgage may be granted in favour of the plaintiff. Subsequently the plaint was amended and Mst Rami was also joined as a plaintiff and it was prayed that if for any reason the sale of equity of redemption by Mst. Rami is not recognised, the decree for redemption may be granted in favour of Rami. The suit was resisted by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.