SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Raj) 129

KAN SINGH
Pritam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ranjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Marudhar Mridul, for Petitioner; P.N. Datt and B.R. Arora, for Respondent

KAN SINGH, J.—These are two revision applications directed against the orders passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Karanpur on 12-5-69 in proceedings under sec. 145 Criminal Procedure Code. The two revision applications present similar features and can conveniently be disposed of together. I may narrate the facts with reference to S.B. Cr. Revision No. 88 of 1970.

2. Pritamsingh, party No. 1, in the proceedings before the learned Sub-Divisional magistrate made an application under sec. 145 Criminal P. C. to the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate on 17-9-68 in respect of squares Nos. 33 and 35 of Chak No. 1 N, and alleged that the petitioner was in peaceful possession of these squares, but party No. 2, Ranjitsingh had unlawfully taken possession of the land and destroyed the crop raised by party No. 1. This land was entered in the name of Ram Singhs son Harbans Singh. Harbans Singh was alleged to have sold this land to party No. 2 Ranjitsingh, but inspite of the sale Pritamsingh, Party No. 1 continued to be in possession thereof. Pritamsingh was the brother of Harbansinghs wife Jasbinder Kaur. Smt. Jasbinder Kaur, after the death of her husband started living with her brot





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top