SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Raj) 20

BHARGAVA
Banwari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Mst. Pathsi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hastimal, for Appellants; D.P. Gupta, for Respondents

BHARGAVA, J.—This is a plaintiffs appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18th December, 1965, of the District Judge, Alwar.

2. The plaintiffs are the sons of Umrao Singh who died on 16th April, 1962, leaving behind properties which are mentioned at items Nos. 1 to 11i of Schedule Ka annexed the plaint. Before his death, Umrao Singh by his will dated 10th May, 1961, bequeathed these properties in favour of Mst. Patashi his wife. The defendants in the suit are Mst. Patashi, the step-mother of the plaintiffs, Prem Narain and Durgaprasad the other two sons of Umrao Singh, and Mst. Ratti Devi, daughters of Umrao Singh. Plaintiffs case is that until 10th September, 1961, Umrao Singh and his sons constituted an undivided Hindu family. On 10th September, 1961, the plaintiffs served a notice upon Umrao Singh of their intention to separate and demanded a partition of the properties. However, Umrao Singh died on the 16th April, 1962, without effecting partition of the properties. Plaintiffs case is that the disputed properties were jointly acquired by them and the deceased Umrao Singh and the plaintiffs are entitled to 20/45 the share in each property. A declaration has been further soug










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top