SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Raj) 122

MEHTA
State – Appellant
Versus
B. B. Saxena – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.R. Mohanani on behalf of R.B. Parihar, for petitioner; M.B.L. Bhargava with V.S. Dave, for non petitioner

MEHTA, J.—B. B. Saxena, functioned as Income tax inspector under the Income tax Officer, C-ward, Ajmer, with effect from March 17, 1971. In that capacity he was required to make inquiries into sundry complaints of evasion of income tax. A complaint was made by Saligram Mittal against one Ratnchand, son of Sunderdas, Chand Baori, Ajmer, about evasion of income tax. Income tax Officer C-ward, Ajmer, entrusted the inquiry to accused B. B. Saxena. The accused contacted Ramchand on April 26, 1971, at his shop situate on Plaza Road, Ajmer. Saxena undertook to hush up the complaint provided Ramchand agreed to pay him Rs. 200/- as illegal gratification. Ramchand expressed that he being indigent was unable to pay Rs. 200/-. He, however, agreed to part with Rs. 100/-. Ramchand then made a written complaint to T. B. Singh, Inspector, Special Police Establishment, Jaipur (Camp Aimer). Thereafter on April 20, 1971, a trap was arranged and laid by T. B. Singh, assisted by two Inspectors of the Special Police Establishment, Amar Singh and Ganeshlal. Two independent witnesses J. B. Sengar, Dy. Post-master, Ajmer and B. K. Banerji, Inspector, complaints P & T., Ajmer, were also associated with the







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top