JAGAT NARAYAN, BERI
Krishan Chancier – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue for Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The agricultural lands were owned by one Narain the common ancestor of the plaintiffs and the defendants. Narain had 5 sons Onkarlal, Kanhaiyalal, Motilal, Chunilal and Chogalal. The branches of Kanhaiyalal and Chunilal have admittedly become extinct. Onkarlal had two sons Radha Vallabh and Gopi Vallabh. The plaintiffs are the sons of Gopi Vallabh. Defendants No. 1 and 2 are the sons of Radha Vallabh. Defendants No. 9 and 6 are sons of defendant No. 2 Defendant No. 7 it the s/o defendant No. 9. Defendant No. 3 is the s/o Motilal and defendant No. 8 is the son of defendant No. 3. The plaintiffs alleged in the alternative that Gopi Vallabh was adopted by Chhogalals widow Smt. Ved Devi. If the adoption is proved the share of the plaintiffs would be one-third in the property in suit. If it is not proved then their share would be one-fourth.
3. The suit was resisted inter alia on the ground that Gopi Vallabh had renounced his share in the coparcenary property and his sons consequentl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.