SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Raj) 5

BERI
Madan Gopal Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Leelaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.B.L. Bhargava with S.N. Bhargava for appellant; Arjundas with B.J. Mohnani, for respondent No. 1

BERI, J.—By his order 9th March, 1971, the learned Civil Judge, Ajmer, has rejected the Municipal Election Petition of Madan Gopal Gupta because it was not presented to the District Judge himself but to the Musarim of that Court. Madan Gopal Gupta, the petitioner, appeals.

2. The facts, which it is necessary to notice for the disposal of this appeal, briefly stated are these: Dr. Leela Ram, respondent No. 1, was elected as a member from Ward No. 17 to the Ajmer Municipal Council and the petitioner and the respondents Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 were defeated. The election took place on 25-10-70 and the counting was made on 26-10-70 and on the same day the result was declared. A petition challenging the election was submitted on 25-11-70 before the Munsarim of the District Judge, Ajmer. By his order dated l9-1-1971 the petition was transferred to the Civil Judge, Ajmer An application was made by the respondent No. 1 on January 2, 1971, in which the respondent No.1 raised the grounds that the election petition was neither presented by the proper person nor before the appropriate authority as required by S. 36 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 (hereinafter called "the Act"). The learned



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top