KAN SINGH
Dhool Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bardhu Bai – Respondent
According to the plaintiff, the house in question, in a portion of which defendant-respondent Kishore Singh, now represented by his legal representatives, was living belonged to one Nathaji. Nathaji had a son Pannalal who died in 1932. He had two daughters. Dhool Singh, the plaintiff, is the son of one daughter and Kishore Singh, defendant, was the son of another. Pannalal had a son Dhannalal who died during the life time of his father Pannalal. Pannalal was survived by his widow Kesar Bai. Kesar Bai was alleged to have gifted the house in question to the plaintiff Dhool Singh and the same was evidenced by a registered gift deed Ex. 1. On 25-10-1944 the plaintiff Dhool Singh had sold a portion of the house to one Kadar Bux by a registered sale deed Ex. 2 on record. The plaintiff proceeded to say that in 1945 or 1946 the defendant Kishore Singh who was his first cousin was permitted by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.