LODHA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Sindhi Film Exchange – Respondent
2. Two points have been argued in support of the revision application. It is submitted in the first instance that the Small Cause Court had no jurisdiction to try the suit and secondly it is argued that there is absolutely no legal evidence on which the decree can be sustained.
3. The plaintiff non-petitioner alleged in the plaint that he had entered into a contract with the Assistant Engineer, Engineering Cell (Fisheries) Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, to supply two generators on hire for five days from 20-5-69 onwards. But by his letter dated 29 5-69 received at about 5 p. m. marked Ex. 4 the Assistant Engineer cancelled the contract. The plaintiffs case is that on account of the said act of the Assistant Engineer, he was put to a loss of Rs. 500/- for which he filed the present suit in the Court of Small Causes, Jaipur City. The defendant, the State of Rajasthan, neithe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.