KAN SINGH, J —The three writ petitions being of identical nature were heard together and can conveniently be disposed of by a common judgment.

2. The petitioners are dealers at Pali carrying on business inter alia in cotton seeds. They pray for a writ in the nature of certiorari, mandamus or prohibition or any other suitable writ for striking down the item "cotton seeds" from the list of commodities applicable to the Krishi Upaj Mandi, Pali and further the respondents be restrained from calling upon the petitioner to take a licence for carrying on trade in this commodity or to recover fees from the petitioners by taking any coercive action against them. It will be convenient to take the facts from writ petition No. 1981 of 1971.

3. The petitioner avers that he deals in cotton seeds and not in any other commodity. He buys cotton seeds in the State of Gujarat and then brings them to Pali in Rajasthan and sales them at Pali where the commodity is used as a cattle feed. The petitioner further avers that he never buys cotton seeds from the agriculturists in the local market at Pali according to him cotton seed is neither grown in Pali area nor do the agriculturists ever bring cotton seeds for sale to Pali. The Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pali was established in accordance with the provisions of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961, hereinafter to be referred as the "Act", and the petitioner takes the stand that this Act was passed with a view to helping the agriculturists in getting better prices for their produce. This was sought to be done by regulation of markets. The petitioner further takes the stand that since cotton seed is not locally produced in the market area of Pali, there could be no question of including this commodity as an agricultural produce to be regulated by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pali. The petitioner further proceeds to say that the Government had not acted according to the principles underlying the provisions of the Act in including this commodity viz., cotton seeds, for being regulated by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti and consequently the Government notification issued under sec. 3 of the Act for including this commodity was in excess of the powers of the State Government and was thus ultra vires. The petitioner has assailed the Government notification on a number of grounds which were as follows:—

(1) Cotton seed is not a local produce of Pali market area and was, therefore, not liable to be included in the notification under sec. 3 of the Act.

(2) Cotton seed being a component of unginned cotton which is included in the list of u cannot be separately once again included.

(3) The commodity namely, cotton seed, must be bought and sold in the market area before it can be subjected to regulation or imposition of fee by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti.

(4) Since the commodity is brought from outside the State namely, Gujrat where it is already subjected to a fee under a similar legislation, no fee could be demanded by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pali, as that would be duplication of a tax imposts.

(5) The power given to the Government under sec. 3 of the Act to include or exclude a commodity is unguided, arbitrary and no criteria being laid down under the Act is bad. In elaboration which was nothing but repetition the petitioner submitted that he deals only in cotton seeds which are not produced in the Pali area.

4. The petitioner further relied on a latter Ex 3 wherein the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pali had written him to say that the higher authorities have already been moved to take out this commodity from the list. On the basis of it it is contended that the Government had no material for including the commodity as an agricultural produce to be regulated by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pali and in doing so the Government have acted contrary to the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in a number of cases.

5. The writ petition has been opposed by the respondents.

6. The main contention of the le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document