SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Raj) 37

LODHA
Sohan Lal Loonkaran – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.M. Parakh, for Petitioner; D.S. Shisodiya, Addl. Government Advocate

LODHA, J.—Only one short point has been argued in support of this write petition and it is this that sec. 5-A inserted in the Rajasthan (Display of Prices of Essential Commodities) Order, 1966 (which will hereinafter be referred to as the order) is ultra vires and void having been made without the prior concurrence of the Central Government and, therefore, the orders Exhibit-1 and Exhibit 2 dated 3 May, 1974 and 1 July, 1974 respectively, issued by the Collector, Barmer and the confiac-ation of the cement and the prosecution launched against the petitioner in pursuance there of are liable to be quashed.

2. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5 of the Essential Commodities Act (Act No. 10 of 1955), the Central Government, vide S. O. No. 1844 dated June 18, 1966, directed :—

"(a) that the powers conferred on it by subsection (i) of section 3 of the said Act to make orders to provide for the matters specified in clauses (d), (e), (f), (g), (h) (i) (ii), and (j) of sub section (2) thereof shall, inrelation to all commodities other than food-stuffs and fertilisers (whether inorganic, organic or mixed), be exercisable also by a State Government or, in relation to a Union Territo
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top