SHARMA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Moti Singh – Respondent
2. All these applications in revision arise out of separate trials being held in each case in the Court of the Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur. The trials are in respect of offences punishable under the Official Secrets Act, 1923, hereinafter referred to as the Act. It appears that in each of the 4 cases cognizance was taken on complaints which were made after police investigation under Chapter XIV of the old Code of Criminal Procedure. After investigations no charge-sheets under sec. 173, Cr. P. C were filed, because the condition required to take cognizance of an offence under the Act is that there must be a complaint made by order of, or under authority from the appropriate Government, or some officer empowered by such Government, in this behalf.
3. The accused in all these four cases claimed copies of documents referred to in sec. 173, Cr P. C. as of right and the Sessions Judge trying the cases directed the prosecution to furnish
(4) Noor Khan vs. State of Rajasthan ( AIR 1964 SC 286 )
(5) Purshottam vs. State of Kutch ( AIR 1954 SC 700 )
(6) Pravin Chandra vs. State of A.P. ( AIR 1965 SC 1185 )
(1) Ramendra Singh vs. Mohit Choudhary ( AIR 1969 Cal. 535 )
(2) Chittaranjan Das vs. State of West Bengal ( AIR 1963 Cal. 191 )
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.