MODI, J.—This is a second appeal by the plaintiff Champalal against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Bikaner, dated 21-1-67, affirming the decree of the Civil Judge, Ratangarh, dismissing the suit.

2. The dispute relates to the recovery of a jeep car bearing registration No. RJK 1120 or its price amounting to Rs. 5000/.

3. The defendant respondant No. 2 Jiwanram is the uncle of the defendant-respondent No. 1 Ramchander. The plaintiff-appellant is a resident of Bhinasar, district Bikaner, whereas the defendant-respondents are the residents of Hanuman-garh, district Garganagar. Both the towns Bhinasar & Hanumangarh, were formerly the parts of the erstwhile State of Bikaner which subsequently merged into the State of Rajasthan. The plaintiff and the defendant Ramchander knew each other very well from the times of the erstwhile State of Bikaner.

4. The plaintiff came with the case that the defendant Ramchander was in need of a jeep car and since he knew that the plaintiff owned and possessed jeep-car No. RJK 1120, he sent his uncle Jiwanram to bring the plaintiffs jeep-car for sometime for his use as amanat. At the request of Jiwanram on behalf of Ramchander, the plaintiff d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document