SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Raj) 106

TYAGI
Maina – Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ganpat Singh, for Appellant; B.R. Mehia, for Respondent No. 2; Mishrilal and R.R. Purohit, for Respondent No. 3

TYAGI, J.—This appeal has been filed by the claimants under sec 110 D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 challenging the award of the Accident Motor Claims Tribunal, Bikaner dated 6th June, 1970.

2. On 2nd June, 1966 one Ram Kumar was looking after his truck on the road between Gajner and Bikaner at a distance of about 5 miles from Nall. A truck bearing No. R.J. K. 3528 driven by Niranjan Singh driver came from Bikaner side and dashed against Ram Kumar who was standing on the road. As a result of that accident Ram Kumar sustained serious head injuries. He was immediately removed to the hospital but his life could not be saved. Ram Kumars wife Smt. Maina, his minor son Babu, minor daughter Panchu and mother Smt. Chandra filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bikaner for Rs. 10,000/- as damages for the death of Ram Kumar. In their application driver Niranjan Singh, owner of the truck Mohanlal and the General Assurance Society Ltd. were made parties

3. Mohanlal came out with a plea that he had sold this truck which was registered in his name to one Karnail Singh son of Niranjan Singh on 15-1-1963, and Karnail Singh further sold the vehicle to another Karnail Singh son of


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top