SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Raj) 25

SHRIMAL, TYAGI
Babulal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhim Raj, for Appellant; S.K. Tewari, Additional Advocate General for State

SHRIMAL, J.—This appeal has been directed against the judgment dated Nove-mber 26, 1974 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Jodhpur whereby the accused-appellant Babulal, son of Moolchand Sadh was convicted for the murder of Babulal, son of Chhotu Ram Harijan, under section 302 I. P. G. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of which he was to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of one year.

2. The prosecution story in a nutshell is that on April 27, 1974 between 4.30 p.m. to 5 30 p.m. Babulal Harijan (since deceased) had gone to the hotel owned and managed by the brother of the accused. At that time the author of the first information report P.W. 6 Kamal happened to come on the shop to take tea. The accused asked Babulal Harijan (since deceased) why he was not being seen near the hotel in those days. He replied that he had not gone anywhere cut of Jodhpur, whereupon the accused further enquired, what made him to bully the hotel boys. The deceased protested and denied the allegations which annoyed the accused, who in turn told that he would make him forget his "Dadagiri" (scoundrelism). Uttering th





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top