SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Raj) 32

GUPTA
Abdul Aziz – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.R. Vyas, for Petitioner; R.N. Munshi, for Respondents; M.D. Purohit, Additional Government Advocate.

GUPTA, J. — This writ petition deserves to be dismissed as the grounds sought to be raised therein already stand concluded by this Court and the Supreme Court.

2. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) published a draft scheme for the nationalisation of Dungarpur-Peeth route under section 68C of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The aforesaid draft scheme was published in the Rajasthan Gazette dated April 3, 1976 inviting objections in respect thereof from the concerned operators. The petitioner and several others raised objections. The Joint Legal Remembrancer No. II, Government of Rajasthan, who is empowered to hear the objections in respect of the draft schemes of nationalisation on behalf of the State Government, under the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 68-D of the Act, decided some of the objections stayled as preliminary objections by his order dated September 25, 1976. The matter is yet to be heard and decided on merits by the aforesaid Joint Legal Remembrancer. The present writ petition has been filed in this Court challenging the order passed by the Joint Legal Remembrancer on Septembe












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top