SEN, SHRIMAL
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Nana Ram – Respondent
2. Tersely speaking, shorn of unnecessary details, the prosecution case, as disclosed at the trial is that PW. 4 Shri Chothu Ram, his wife Mst. Lichhma (since deceased) and the accused Nanuram with his family used to reside in the same compound. P.W. 4 Chothuram and accused-appellant Nanuram used to work as "Series" of P.W.1 Sultan Singh. Nearly 40 days prior to the date of the occurrence Mst. Lichhma (decessed) had given birth to a child. On the fateful day the accused-appellant Nanuram was working on the filed in which tube-well is situated and PW. 4 Chothuram was working at a little distance from those fields. Mst. Lichhma (deceased) used to habitually wear silver Hansali Art. 2, and a pair of silver Kadi Art. 3, and a gold fascimile of Pubuji in a locket form tied with a black thread. On the date of incident Mst. Lichhma (deceased) in the company of PW. 5 Mst. Pipli and Mst. Charanki went to fetch grass. Nearly at 12 in the noon afte
(1) Sundarlal vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh (AIR 1954 SC 28)
(2) Bhagwan Das vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1957 SC 589)
(3) Ramratan vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1962 SC 424)
(6) Wasimkhan vs. State of U.P. (AIR 1956 SC 400)
(8) K. Chinna Swamy Reddi vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (AIR 1962 SC 1788)
(11) Tulsiram vs. State (AIR 1954 SC 1)
(14) Sanwat Khan vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1956 SC 54)
(15) Sheonath vs. State of U.P. (AIR 1970 SC 483)
(16) Mohd. Inayatullah vs. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1976 SC 483)
(4) Shankar Bhika vs. The State of Maharashtra (AIR. 1972 SC 1171)
(5) Bam Prakash vs. State of Punjab (AIR 959 SC 1)
(7) Kottaya vs. Emperor (AIR 1947 PC. 67)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.